Regular users of the Darling Harbour ferry will welcome the route
changes announced today by Transport Minister Andrew Constance. The change will
see a merging of the existing Watsons Bay and Rose Bay services into the F4 Darling
Harbour line and operated by the new nippy (26 knot) Heritage Class ferries.
You will be able to take a ferry to Rose Bay or Watsons Bay
from Pyrmont Bay, Barangaroo, Balmain East, McMahons Point or Milsons Point
without transferring at Circular Quay. Even better, you will actually be able
to ride the ferry from Pyrmont Bay to Barangaroo. It is currently an annoying
loop, which allows passengers to go from King Street wharf to Pyrmont Bay, but
not back again.
But closer scrutiny suggests the change has some downsides too.
If the hard to manoeuvre new Heritage Class boats can handle
the reversing from Pyrmont Bay quickly (there’s no guarantee her issues in
dealing with high winds have been or will ever be solved), then making it
possible for passengers to return to Barangaroo from Pyrmont Bay will be a big
improvement.
I love through lines, and the merger of Watsons Bay services
with Darling Harbour is a through line, but will this particular marriage be a
happy one? I’m not so sure.
What is not revealed in the media release is that there will
not actually be peak services to Watsons Bay. Commuters from Watsons Bay will
continue to be serviced by a non regulated Captain Cook ferry direct to
Circular Quay. In peak periods, the line will terminate in the east at Rose Bay
in the peaks as they do now and operate every 20 minutes. This means the Darling
Harbour section of the route also needs to offer 20 minute headways, even
though morning peak capacity is currently 25% at best with 30 minute headways.
Does Darling Harbour really need a ferry every 20 minutes in the AM peak?
Probably not. Although the DH PM peaks are swelled by tourists in summer, even
then I don’t recall a Darling Harbour boat reaching capacity during a week-day PM
peak.
There are better candidates for through lines in Sydney. One
of them is Darling Harbour and Taronga Zoo as both have similar tourist
profiles and could be joined into a single through line on a 90 minute cycle
with 30 minute headways, increasing to 15 minutes for high demand tourist
periods. There would also be an option to extend the cycle to 120 minutes by
adding an extension from Barangaroo to White Bay. But then that would mean retaining
the SuperCats as there won’t be enough Heritage Class ferries to operate both
the Zoo-Darling Harbour service and the Rose Bay/ Watson Bay service. I am in
the camp that believes Sydney should retain the SuperCats.
What Rose Bay ferry commuters may not realise is that the journey
to their new office in Barangaroo each morning will be a long
one with a lot of intermediate stops. It’s about 11 minutes from Rose Bay to Circular
Quay on a fast ferry. This will be followed by a 3 or 4 minute wait to unload
passengers then a further 21 minutes with three stops before arriving at
Barangaroo. That’s a total journey of 35 or 36 minutes. And a lot of people in the
Rose Bay area think they live in the 30 minute city! It may actually be quicker
to alight at Circular Quay, take the train to Wynyard and wander down to your
Barangaroo office through the Wynyard Walk.
And the long standing complaint about lack of Sydney Ferry
peak services to Watsons Bay - which is that on week-days, even Friday nights, the last Sydney Ferry departs Watsons Bay at 4.45 pm – will presumably not be
addressed by these changes.
These may seem like trifling objections, but there is a bigger issue. Yes,
through lines are a good idea, but in isolation they can be just a kludge. Wouldn’t
it make more sense to reconfigure the entire ferry network into a pulse
timetable, with all services which meet at Circular Quay having convenient
transfer times? We would then have something very close to a city with a go
from anywhere/ go to anywhere ferry network. Just like public transport in
other grown up cities.
