A proposal by residents for a ferry stop in the inner east Sydney suburb of Woolloomooloo gets a run from time to time. It came up again last week, with the Wentworth Courier reporting on a public meeting in support of a new ferry service to Andrew (Boy) Charlton Pool, on the western side of Woolloomooloo Bay.
The idea also has the backing of the nearby Art Gallery of New South Wales.
Unfortunately, the case for a new ferry stop at Boy Charlton Pool - or anywhere in Woolloomooloo Bay - is less than convincing.
A generally accepted rule of public transport planning is that most passengers will walk up to 800 metres to a train or ferry stop. Resistance increases with obstacles such as steps or a busy road. If a ferry wharf is located at Boy Charlton Pool, the only Woolloomooloo residents to benefit will be those living in the 100 or so apartments in Lincoln Crescent. For almost everyone else, the walk to the pool is more than 800 metres and may involve crossing the four lane Cowper Wharf Road.
Even visitors to the Art Gallery may be deterred as the walking distance from the pool to the extended Gallery is about 600 metres.
There is also the issue of how to integrate Woolloomooloo into the current ferry network. Two options are available:
- add a stop to the existing Double Bay line
- make Woolloomooloo a stand-alone line, like Taronga Zoo.
Both options are problematic. The current Double Bay line follows a reasonably direct route. Making a diversion into Woolloomooloo Bay will add significantly to the travel time of existing Double Bay, Darling Point and Garden Island passengers.
 |
| Existing Double Bay line, superimposed with a diversion to Boy Charlton Pool (in yellow) |
Option 2 is even less attractive. For the reasons already outlined, demand is likely to be tiny. Even if the wharf was located nearer to Cowper Wharf Road and the head of Woolloomooloo Bay, walking directly to Macquarie Street in the CBD would offer a competitive alternative in time than a ferry ride to Circular Quay.
More importantly, there are simply not the berthing facilities available at Circular Quay for an additional line. The Quay struggles to accommodate the existing nine lines.
It is very understandable that residents of Woolloomooloo would like to have a ferry wharf near their doorstep. But on a scale of places suitable for ferry connection, Woolloomooloo does not rate highly.
Robin,
ReplyDeleteYours is certainly an interesting position. I could almost say unique. The State Governmnent's Sydney's Ferry Future report of May 2013 looked at 30 harbourside sites with the potential for expanding the Sydney ferry network and concluded that five, including Woolloomooloo Bay, were worthy of further investigation.
In 2018, the NRMA report, Blue Highways said, “There is also an opportunity to introduce new services in locations that currently don’t have access to ferries. Woolloomooloo as an example could act as the gateway to The Domain, the Art Gallery of New South Wales and Mrs Macquarie’s Chair, as well as offering visitors and tourists access to some of Sydney’s finest dining establishments and places of interest.”
I also think that Woolloomooloo may be a case where your generally accepted 800-metre rule may not apply. The only public transport available to Woolloomooloo residents is the less-than-twice-an-hour 311 bus. Many use the train from Kings Cross, but this requires climbing up the Woolloomooloo Hill to Victoria Street. For those with less mobility, an accessible ferry stop may be a much more attractive option.
There is near unanimous support for a ferry wharf from all Woolloomooloo residents and some Potts Point residents may also chose to take the ferry to the Quay, or eastward to Rose Bay and Watsons Bay. And then there is the ever increasing tourists in the area.
The Woolloomooloo Ferry forum is a group which has formed to advocate for government to implement their existing and long-held plans for ferry expansion into Woolloomooloo Bay.